Can EQF classify programs and occupations?
11. Can the EQF be used to classify education programmes and occupations?
The EQF was not designed to classify educational programmes or occupations, but instead focuses on qualifications systems and frameworks. The EQF levels do not reflect participation in any particular education programmes or competences required for particular tasks or occupations. Of course, qualifications are related to education and training and to the occupational world and these elements are very important in the EQF. ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) and ISCO (International Standard Classification of Occupations) are classifications specifically designed to classify education and occupations. The EQF only partially implies a hierarchy of educational programmes (e.g. a qualification on a higher level in the EQF very likely will correspond to a higher level on the ISCED levels) and a hierarchy of occupations (e.g. a qualification on a lower EQF level will very likely lead to an occupational activity ranked on a lower level in the ISCO skill levels) However, the EQF focuses on learning outcomes in the form of knowledge, skills and competence; these are seen autonomously of education programmes or occupational contexts.
The EQF thus constitutes a new instrument, which offers the possibility to combine educational and occupational taxonomies and, in a way, bridges ISCED and ISCO.
- Why metaframework?
- What are principles of descriptors?
- What means knowledge, skills and competence?
- Why only these dimensions?
- Qualification versus competence?
- Qualification and different levels?
- Which column is more important?
- EQF as a ladder?
- Can EQF descriptors be used for NQF?
- Where are other competences?
- Can EQF classify programs and occupations?
- EQF and EHEA relationship?